Arizona Officials Barred From Enforcing Identity
has seen in years.
City Council To Hear Short Term Rental OrdinanceHundreds of residents are expected to attend the Wednesday, June 21, Las Vegas City Council meeting regarding proposed amendments to the city ordinances on short term properties. in Council Chambers at City Hall, 495 S. Main Street.
Judge Mulling Nevada Bid for Recreational Pot Sales July 1Nevada marijuana regulators are working furiously to launch recreational sales on July 1, a fast approaching deadline that could hinge on a court deciding whether the powerful liquor industry should be guaranteed a piece of the pot pie before tourists and residents can light up. illegally, you should be looking over your shoulder and be concerned that you will be returned to your country of origin.
Up And Coming International Vacation SpotsThings change fast in the international world of travel. From time to time, there are fairly untouched gems, fake ids like Mozambique 15 years ago or Cuba 10 years ago. For very different reasons, Germany, Argentina, the Philippines, and Madagascar are destinations to consider or re consider for your up and coming vacation bucket list. Destinations For History BuffsHistory buffs yearning to experience places that highlight the country rich traditions, landmarks, and defining events will head for America oldest cities, fake ids significant war monuments, and important buildings for a sense of the past.
PHOENIX (AP) A judge has barred Maricopa County officials from enforcing two Arizona identity theft laws that have been used to convict hundreds of immigrant workers. District Judge David Campbell came nearly three weeks after Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio voluntarily disbanded his squad that raided dozens of businesses to arrest more than 700 immigrants who were charged with using fake or stolen IDs to get jobs.
While other agencies make arrests under the two laws, Arpaio office is the only department in the state to raid businesses in enforcement of the statutes. The closure of the sheriff squad ended Arpaio last major foothold in immigration enforcement after the courts and federal government have gradually reined in his powers in recent years.
Campbell said immigrant rights advocates who challenged the enforcement of the ID theft laws are likely to succeed in claiming the state identity theft laws are trumped by federal law.
Annie Lai, an attorney leading the challenge of the two laws, said that Monday ruling gives the immigrant community extra protection if Arpaio were to pursue such cases in the future. they were to decide they wanted to resume the workplace raids, that would now be in violation of a federal court order, Lai said.
Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery said the ruling yet again the consequences of federal inaction and the Obama administration indifference to the effects of unlawful immigration practices. pretending to address the concerns of people admittedly violating the law, fake id the victims of identity theft are deprived of the state of Arizona protection. Appealing the grant of a preliminary injunction is under review, Montgomery added in a statement.
Arpaio said citizens of Maricopa County have been stripped of another protection that this state attempted to enact to protect the integrity and identity of its citizens. do not understand how federal law can pre empt state law when the federal government has proven it has no desire to protect its citizens in these areas. I hope that the decision to appeal this particular opinion is made bravely and quickly, Arpaio added in a statement Monday night.
The 2007 and 2008 laws were revamped versions of Arizona identity theft statutes that made it a new crime to use fake or stolen IDs for the purpose of getting or keeping jobs. They were part of a package of legislation that sought to confront employers who hire immigrants who are in the country illegally and are blamed for fueling the nation border woes. The package has been criticized as focusing too heavily on workers and too little on employers.
Attorneys seeking to overturn the laws had argued that the Legislature intent in passing the two laws wasn to confront identity theft but rather to combat illegal immigration and prompt immigrants to leave the country.
County lawyers who defended the laws in court contended the purpose of the laws wasn to confront illegal immigration but rather to combat identity theft.
Supporters of the ID theft laws say immigrants who steal identities to get jobs are still committing a crime and that victims could face difficulties such as getting loans.
In recent years, the courts have struck down several Arizona laws that sought to confront illegal immigration, such as a 2006 voter approved law that denied bail to certain immigrants.
Still, a small number of Arizona immigration laws have been upheld, including a key section of the state landmark 2010 immigration law that requires police to check people immigration status under certain circumstances.